many days, you shall not play the whore, you shall not have intercourse with a man, nor I
with you (Hos. 3:3; cf. 2:14). Grace has its own law, its
torah. Out of the divine-human
bonding with its conjoined interhuman bonding, authentic faith produces its work. This
discipline is not arbitrary and punitive, but is rehabilitative, relevant to Gomer’s (and
Hosea’s) attempt to rebuild their marriage on more than a mere physical relationship.
After many days,
sexual intercourse will then consummate their bonded relationship.
But grace has its risks. After Hosea has spent all and done all, will bonding
happen? Yahweh will somehow win Israel’s heartfelt response: afterward the Israelites
shall return and seek Yahweh their God... (Hos. 3:5). But what about Gomer? The text
leaves the case open as to whether or not Hosea succeeds. Hosea himself can only
respond to the command of God in faith, believing that what Yahweh commands Yahweh
will achieve. But how? Perhaps only by a profound emotional struggle in the hearts of
Gomer and Hosea—and perhaps at the heart of the universe, in the heart of Yahweh?
Hosea shares this risk—and this agony—with his God (cf. Hos. 11:8-9). But the point is
that Yahweh’s act of grace toward rebellious Israel has become the model for healing in a
broken human relationship. Retribution and death, still a characteristic of Sinai technique
law (Exod. 20:22—23:19), is replaced by God’s covenant love and forgiveness,
characteristic of Sinai covenant and policy law (19:4: 20:6). A new law of grace is
effected; for Gomer, the death penalty is over!.
The Prophets of the Exile: Beyond Retribution to Forgiveness and Fulfillment
Beyond retribution and the threat of the end, Jeremiah projects with Hosea that
there will be a new beginning, this time a new act of covenant. Filling the promise of the
Sinai covenant, law will be written upon the heart (Jer. 32: 31-34;
cf. Exod. 20:17).
Ezekiel revises biblical covenant law in Babylon by limiting retribution to the first
generation:
It is only the person who sins that shall die (18:4; cf. Exod. 20:5)
. Even then,
this wicked person will not die if he repents (18:21). One of the catalogues of sins for
which a person will not die if he repents includes the sin of murder:
a son who is violent,
a shedder of blood (18:10). Yahweh ends the chapter:
for I have no pleasure in the death
of anyone, says the Lord God. Turn then, and live (18:32).
Beyond the end threatened by Amos, Ezekiel promises resurrection. Out of divine
integrity, God will gather Israel from the nations, return them to their own land, cleanse
them from their rebellion, and put within them a new heart and spirit so that they will
obey covenant law (Ezek. 36:26). Covenant love rather than retribution is Yahweh’s
last
word (cf. Jer. 31:27-30)!
A later prophet of the exile, Isaiah 40—55, is perhaps the most creative of the
prophets in portraying covenant justice as the exchange of Yahweh’s love for retribution
and death. He prophesies that the Creator of Israel who, as in the redemption from Egypt,
makes a way in the sea, a path in the mighty waters,
will make a new thing,
a way in the
wilderness to lead Israel back home from exile (Isa. 43:15-19). Retribution is over!
Relating to our subject,
the law and the prophets, the climax of Isaiah 40—55 is found in
the four traditional servant poems (42:1-6; 49:1-5; 50:4-9; 52:13-53:12; cf. Oswalt:3-19).
Together the poems form a biography of a public servant, the first presenting his
installation into public life, the last reviewing his end and reflecting on the meaning of his
public service (cf. Lind, Monotheism
:153-163). I present five themes of these poems:
The servant is commissioned to establish Yahweh’s justice in the nations (42:1--4).
The servant is equipped with Yahweh’s Spirit, and is to effect Yahweh’s justice
nonviolently, by means of Yahweh’s word (42:2-3; 49:2; 50:4-5).
The servant encounters mounting opposition to his message of Yahweh’s justice,
opposition which issues in his death. All this he patiently accepts in pursuit of his task
(42:4; 49:4; 50:6-9; 52:13-53:12).
The servant achieves his purpose of establishing Yahweh’s justice in the nations only
by Yahweh’s intervention
, who reverses the judgment of the nations by elevating the
rejected servant to a place of rule
(52:13-15; 53:12).
The kings and nations confess their rebellion against Yahweh and acknowledge that
the suffering of the servant is on their behalf, that by his bruises
they are healed
The nonviolent ministry of this servant contrasts with the work of Cyrus who,
though anointed as shepherd king by Yahweh to rebuild Jerusalem and return Israel to
that city, does so by violence and does not know Yahweh (Isa. 44:28-45:5; cf. 46:11).
This violent Cyrus never becomes Yahweh’s “king of justice;” rather, Yahweh’s justice
for the nations is the task of the nonviolent prophet of the Servant Poems. As in the
Pentateuch all law codes are prophetic covenant codes rather than kingship codes
undergirded by violent human power, so this prophetic figure rather than the violent
emperor Cyrus is Servant of Yahweh’s covenant law to the nations! It is the covenant
war God, Yahweh—unlike the baalistic war god of the emperor Cyrus who speaks
through violent storm and fire—who establishes covenant justice in the nations by the
still small voice
of God and/or sheer silence of a receptive, suffering prophet!
Elijah, traditionally the greatest of the prophets, makes a pilgrimage to
Sinai/Horeb to discover why he is ineffective in his conflict against the baalistic apostasy
of
Omri’s dynasty and Queen Jezebel. There it is clarified that the prophets’ Warrior
God Yahweh, unlike the kingship warrior god Baal, is identified not with the storm but
with the “still small voice” of
prophetic communication. This clarification at the Center
of the Sinai/Horeb experience is yet to work itself out, however, in its tension with Sinai
technique law,
law as it is applied at the city gate and elsewhere. There follows the blood